I consider their account of experiences of different kinds of habits, and of the different kinds of potencies and obedience to reason that underlie their habits. ![]() In this paper, I show how some scholastics themselves, including Aquinas and Suárez, give evidence for Thomistic hylomorphism from their descriptions of our experience of forming and using habits. Some object that nothing can be both a form and a subsistent entity, and some proponents of Thomistic hylomorphism respond that our experience, as described by phenomenology, provides us with evidence that this theory is true. Below is Mark's abstract: Thomistic hylomorphism holds that human persons are composed of matter and a form that is also a subsistent entity. It extends the argument that he gave in his dissertation chaired by Professot Jorge Gracia. Mark's paper is called "Habits, Potencies, and Obedience: Experiential Evidence for Thomistic Hylomorphism".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |